Demos

E-petitions to the House of Commons

What each petition asks Parliament to do. Signing happens on petitions.ourcommons.ca — Demos never signs for you.

Parliament, filtered through what you care about

Take a short values survey and Demos shows you the bills and petitions that touch what you care about.

A free account lets you record where you stand, see how your MP voted, email them about it, and get a summary of what matches you — daily, weekly, monthly, or not at all.

New to this? Read How Canadian e-petitions work ↗

Filter by category Economic Governance Environmental Identity Reconciliation Clear

Showing only items in every category you picked.

Demos does not rank petitions by importance — choose the order that is useful to you.

What it means for you

Canadians could see stronger government action on hate crimes, more transparency around extremist groups, and tighter regulation of social media algorithms that spread harmful content.

Sponsored by Sukh Dhaliwal (Surrey Newton) · Liberal

GovernanceIdentity
Read the petition text

Statistics Canada marked a 245% increase in hate crimes across Canada between 2015 and 2025;

Canadian security agencies have warned about the rise of domestic and internationally affiliated hate groups in Canada, with CBC revealing in March 2026 that over 30 of the 200+ global active clubs are based in Canada;

According to CSIS’ Public Report 2025, nearly 1 in 10 CSIS terrorism investigations involve a suspect under 18, underscoring the rise of youth radicalization; and

Over a dozen whistleblowers revealed to the BBC that TikTok and Meta allowed harmful content to proliferate following evidence that algorithmic outrage increased engagement.

We, the undersigned,citizens and residents of Canada, call upon theGovernment of Canadato: 1. Commission an immediate public inquiry investigating the rise of hate and extremist groups in Canada and outlining recommendations for all levels of government; 2. Publicly declare that Canada has a hate crime crisis and send a relevant Public Safety Canada briefing to all municipal and provincial governments; 3. Strengthen the transparency and timeliness of the process pertaining to the listing of organizations meeting the legal threshold for designation as terrorist entities, while ensuring clear criteria, appropriate procedural safeguards, and meaningful judicial review; 4. Establish a national, live data-sharing platform for hate crime reporting while protecting privacy rights; and 5. Emulate internationally proven best practices to reduce hate on very large online platforms while safeguarding privacy, including mandating auditing of API data by independent researchers, creating non-algorithmic feeds, and labeling AI-generated content.

518 signatures +13 past week

Recent daily signatures

Sign by February 10, 2027
What it means for you

Canadians shopping for groceries, lumber, or other goods would see prices and measurements in metric units (kilograms, metres, litres) rather than imperial ones, aligning Canada more closely with most of its trading partners.

Sponsored by Will Greaves (Victoria) · Liberal

EconomicGovernanceIdentity
Read the petition text

This government seeks to diversify Canada's trading partners, doubling non-U.S. exports by 2035;

Polling has found strong support among Canadians for increased non-U.S. trade;

The vast majority of countries use metric units as their principal measurement system for commerce; and

Alignment on weights and measures can facilitate trade.

We, the undersigned,citizens and residents of Canada, call upon theGovernment of Canadato: 1. Phase out the commercial use of Schedule II units under the Weights and Measures Act, including pricing, packaging, advertising, billing, and measurement devices used in trade; 2. Phase out the use of Schedule II units in federal communications, digital services, and procurement; and 3. Require consumer products sold in Canada that display measurements to display Schedule I units by default.

354 signatures +133 past week

Recent daily signatures

Sign by February 4, 2027
What it means for you

Immigrant victims of domestic violence who have already escaped their abusive partner could still qualify for immigration protection, and the application process would be faster and easier to navigate.

Sponsored by Luc Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable—Lotbinière) · Conservative

GovernanceIdentity
Read the petition text

The immigration status of victims of family or domestic violence often depends on the abusive spouse;

Canada has created a temporary resident permit for victims of family violence, which allows victims to escape their situation and which gives them a new future;

The temporary resident permit for victims of family violence has four eligibility requirements, including "experiencing abuse or neglect by your spouse or common-law partner (your abuser) while in Canada”;

Victims of family or domestic violence who experienced violence in Canada but were able to leave the abusive relationship while in Canada are regularly excluded from making a request because of this requirement, which puts them in a vulnerable situation; and

Family violence can continue even after the relationship ends, which is known as post-separation abuse.

We, the undersigned,citizens of Canada,call upon theMinister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenshipto:1. Review the eligibility requirements and directives of the temporary resident permit for victims of family violence in order to further protect victims during and after their relationship with an abusive spouse; and2. Review the complexity of the process for the temporary resident permit for victims of family violence in order to simplify and speed up immigration requests. 1. Review the eligibility requirements and directives of the temporary resident permit for victims of family violence in order to further protect victims during and after their relationship with an abusive spouse; and 2. Review the complexity of the process for the temporary resident permit for victims of family violence in order to simplify and speed up immigration requests.

376 signatures +4 past week

Recent daily signatures

Sign by January 7, 2027
What it means for you

Canadians who sign this petition are asking the government to slow down and prove its AI plan is actually good for workers, students, the environment, and the arts before spending massive amounts of public money.

Sponsored by Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) · Green Party

EconomicGovernanceEnvironmentalIdentity
Read the petition text

The government’s “AI for All” Strategy (published June 4, 2026) encourages heavy adoption of AI by businesses without considering the probable impacts on Canadian job numbers;

The Strategy earmarks $200 billion in taxpayer money for a speculative and unproven technology;

The Strategy fails to address the environmental and climate impacts of 60% AI adoption by 2034; and

The Strategy aims to “provide access to trusted AI agents for every post-secondary student” while disregarding the likely consequences to educational standards (i.e. widespread AI-enabled cheating).

We, the undersigned,citizens and residents of Canada, call upon theGovernment of Canadato: 1. Immediately conduct a study of the Strategy’s likely impact on short-term and long-term Canadian job numbers; 2. If a net job loss is forecasted, rework the Strategy to prioritize job preservation and creation for Canadians; 3. Commit the $200 billion in stages, with subsequent investment dependent on real, tangible benefits for Canadians, and prioritize Canadian-owned, Canadian-housed servers; 4. Undertake a rigorous scientific assessment of the likely environmental and climate impacts of 60% AI adoption by 2034; 5. Work closely with the academic sector to ensure meaningful educational standards are maintained; 6. Uphold Canada’s national mandate to “foster and promote the study and enjoyment of, and the production of works in, the arts,” and protect the interests of Canadian creators against mass-produced AI content; and 7. Weighing all projected negative impacts (economic, educational, social, and environmental) against projected benefits, reassess whether there is a clear mandate for the Strategy, or whether it should be revoked or modified.

332 signatures +16 past week

Recent daily signatures

Sign by December 8, 2026