Demos

Bills before Parliament

What each bill does, in plain language. Both sides of the debate where there has been one.

Parliament, filtered through what you care about

Take a short values survey and Demos shows you the bills and petitions that touch what you care about.

A free account lets you record where you stand, see how your MP voted, email them about it, and get a summary of what matches you — daily, weekly, monthly, or not at all.

Filter by category Economic Governance Environmental Identity Reconciliation Clear

Showing only items in every category you picked.

New to this? Read How a bill becomes law in Canada ↗

Ordered by the most recent activity in Parliament. Demos does not rank bills by importance.

Bill C-35 2nd reading · Commons

Ban on Importing Goods Made with Forced Labour Act

Bans the importation of goods into Canada that were produced using forced labour, and gives the Minister of Foreign Affairs power to create a watchlist of specific goods suspected of being made with forced labour.

What it means for you

Companies importing goods into Canada would have to prove their products weren't made with forced labour if asked by border officers, or risk having those goods seized and banned from entry.

EconomicGovernanceIdentity
The debate · 6 points

Supporters say

  • Bill C-35 would shift the burden of proof onto importing companies, requiring them to demonstrate their goods are not made with forced labour — rather than placing that burden on government inspectors.
  • The bill would create a published list of high-risk goods, regions, and companies, giving businesses clearer advance notice of where scrutiny will apply and making the system more transparent.
  • Supporters argue the new framework could make Canada's forced labour import controls more rigorous than those currently in place in the United States or Europe.

Critics say

  • Canada's existing enforcement has been extremely weak — only two shipments suspected of containing forced-labour goods were stopped in five years, and both were ultimately released back to the companies involved.
  • Critics argue the real problem is not the legislation but the speed and seriousness of implementation; without fast, meaningful enforcement using new tools, the bill will change little in practice.
  • A previous supply chain transparency law was quietly amended after passage to remove reporting requirements for distributors and retailers, raising concerns that Bill C-35 could similarly be weakened to benefit large corporations.
Bill C-281 Not yet scheduled

An Act to amend the Textile Labelling Act and the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act

Requires Canadian flags of a certain minimum size to have a label showing their country of origin, whether sold, imported, or advertised in Canada.

What it means for you

When you buy a Canadian flag, you'll be able to see on the label whether it was made in Canada or another country like China.

EconomicGovernanceIdentity
No debate summary yet — we'll add the for/against once this bill is debated.
Bill C-251 Not yet scheduled

An Act to amend the Customs Act and the Customs Tariff (forced labour and child labour)

This bill would amend Canada's customs laws to block imports made using forced labour or child labour, modelled after the U.S. approach used to restrict goods from China's Xinjiang region.

What it means for you

Goods made by workers who were forced to work or by children could be seized at the border, and companies would have to prove their supply chains are clean rather than the government having to prove wrongdoing.

EconomicGovernanceIdentity
The debate · 5 points

Supporters say

  • Canada currently inspects only a tiny fraction of imported goods — about 2% at major ports — and very few shipments are ever seized or held. A clearer legal framework with a list of high-risk entities would dramatically improve enforcement.
  • The U.S. model this bill copies has already seized billions of dollars' worth of goods made under forced labour conditions. Canada should adopt the same standard so it is not a back door for products banned elsewhere.
  • Shifting the burden of proof to importers — requiring them to show their supply chains are free of forced labour — would make enforcement more effective and consistent than the current system, where the government must prove wrongdoing.

Critics say

  • The debate excerpts do not contain explicit arguments against the bill itself. Most parliamentary discussion focused on the broader Canada-Indonesia trade agreement debate, not Bill C-251 directly.
  • stricter import rules could affect Canadian businesses that rely on global supply chains and may complicate trade relationships with partner countries.